Previous Next
Patients with acute myocardial infarction requiring invasive mechanical ventilation have a high mortality. In this study, researchers evaluated the association between induction agent and mortality in 5,147 patients in this setting. They compared clinical outcomes between those receiving propofol (1,386 patients) and those receiving etomidate (3,761 patients). Patients in the propofol group were more likely to require vasoactive medication prior to intubation and mechanical circulatory support. The use of propofol was associated with lower mortality than etomidate, even after data adjustment. Total cost, days on ventilator and length of stay were higher in the propofol group.

Source(s) :
Alexander Thomas et al. Propofol vs etomidate for induction prior to invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2024 Mar 28:S0002-8703(24)00074-7. ;

Last press reviews


COVID-19 and coagulation parameters: a link to mortality?

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to millions of deaths...

Resistance training and Multiple Sclerosis: a solution to improve function and quality of life?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central ner...

Endometriosis: the Impact of hormones, sexual practice, and surgical treatments

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease modulated by estrogen leve...