Previous Next
In this study, researchers compared the efficacy, acceptability and feasibility of a creative movement intervention, delivered face-to-face or remotely, in 15 children with autism spectrum disorder. Children in both subgroups showed similar baseline performance and training-related improvements in motor skills, positive/interested affect, socially directed verbalization, interpersonal synchrony and dual/multi-limb coordination. Parents considered remote intervention feasible and acceptable, although they reported a greater effort to supervise and redirect their child's attention, compared with face-to-face intervention. 

Source(s) :
Wan-Chun Su et al. A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy, Fidelity, Acceptability, and Feasibility of Telehealth and Face-to-Face Creative Movement Interventions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Telemed Rep. 2024 Mar 21;5(1):67-77 ;

Last press reviews


COVID-19 and coagulation parameters: a link to mortality?

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to millions of deaths...

Resistance training and Multiple Sclerosis: a solution to improve function and quality of life?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central ner...

Endometriosis: the Impact of hormones, sexual practice, and surgical treatments

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease modulated by estrogen leve...