Previous Next
In recent years, surgeons have increasingly used synthetic or biological grafts in transvaginal repairs for vaginal prolapse. This Cochrane review is an update of one published in 2016 and aims to determine the safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh or biological grafts, compared with native tissue repair or other grafts in the surgical treatment of vaginal prolapse. A total of 51 randomized controlled trials were included, representing 7,846 women. The data suggest that 23% of women still experience symptoms after native tissue repair, a figure ranging from 17% to 22% after permanent mesh repair.

Source(s) :
Ellen Yeung et al. Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 13:3:CD012079. ;

Last press reviews


COVID-19 and coagulation parameters: a link to mortality?

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to millions of deaths...

Resistance training and Multiple Sclerosis: a solution to improve function and quality of life?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central ner...

Endometriosis: the Impact of hormones, sexual practice, and surgical treatments

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease modulated by estrogen leve...