Previous Next
Nasal intermittent positive airway pressure (NIPPV) has been shown to be superior to post-extubation nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in premature neonates. In this comparative efficacy and non-inferiority study, Canadian researchers hypothesized that CPAP would not be inferior to IPPV. In total, data were collected on 843 infants extubated with CPAP and 974 infants extubated with IPPV in 22 neonatal intensive care units. All infants were born before 29 weeks' gestation. The primary endpoint was failure of the initial mode of extubation ≤72 hours. Secondary judgment criteria included failure ≤7 days and reintubation ≤72 hours and ≤7 days. 

Source(s) :
Amit Mukerji et al. CPAP Versus NIPPV Postextubation in Preterm Neonates: A Comparative-Effectiveness Study. Pediatrics. 2024 Mar 21:e2023064045. ;

Last press reviews


COVID-19 and coagulation parameters: a link to mortality?

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to millions of deaths...

Resistance training and Multiple Sclerosis: a solution to improve function and quality of life?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central ner...

Endometriosis: the Impact of hormones, sexual practice, and surgical treatments

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease modulated by estrogen leve...